A curated webspace for Poetry, Politics, and Nature with over 20,000 daily subscribers and over 8,000 archived posts.
I
Complacencies of the peignoir, and late
Coffee and oranges in a sunny chair,
And the green freedom of a cockatoo
Upon a rug mingle to dissipate
The holy hush of ancient sacrifice.
She dreams a little, and she feels the dark
Encroachment of that old catastrophe,
As a calm darkens among water-lights.
The pungent oranges and bright, green wings
Seem things in some procession of the dead,
Winding across wide water, without sound.
The day is like wide water, without sound,
Stilled for the passing of her dreaming feet
Over the seas, to silent Palestine,
Dominion of the blood and sepulchre.
II
Why should she give her bounty to the dead?
What is divinity if it can come
Only in silent shadows and in dreams?
Shall she not find in comforts of the sun,
In pungent fruit and bright, green wings, or else
In any balm or beauty of the earth,
Things to be cherished like the thought of heaven?
Divinity must live within herself:
Passions of rain, or moods in falling snow;
Grievings in loneliness, or unsubdued
Elations when the forest blooms; gusty
Emotions on wet roads on autumn nights;
All pleasures and all pains, remembering
The bough of summer and the winter branch.
These are the measures destined for her soul.
III
Jove in the clouds had his inhuman birth.
No mother suckled him, no sweet land gave
Large-mannered motions to his mythy mind.
He moved among us, as a muttering king,
Magnificent, would move among his hinds,
Until our blood, commingling, virginal,
With heaven, brought such requital to desire
The very hinds discerned it, in a star.
Shall our blood fail? Or shall it come to be
The blood of paradise? And shall the earth
Seem all of paradise that we shall know?
The sky will be much friendlier then than now,
A part of labor and a part of pain,
And next in glory to enduring love,
Not this dividing and indifferent blue.
IV
She says, “I am content when wakened birds,
Before they fly, test the reality
Of misty fields, by their sweet questionings;
But when the birds are gone, and their warm fields
Return no more, where, then, is paradise?”
There is not any haunt of prophecy,
Nor any old chimera of the grave,
Neither the golden underground, nor isle
Melodious, where spirits gat them home,
Nor visionary south, nor cloudy palm
Remote on heaven’s hill, that has endured
As April’s green endures; or will endure
Like her remembrance of awakened birds,
Or her desire for June and evening, tipped
By the consummation of the swallow’s wings.
V
She says, “But in contentment I still feel
The need of some imperishable bliss.”
Death is the mother of beauty; hence from her,
Alone, shall come fulfilment to our dreams
And our desires. Although she strews the leaves
Of sure obliteration on our paths,
The path sick sorrow took, the many paths
Where triumph rang its brassy phrase, or love
Whispered a little out of tenderness,
She makes the willow shiver in the sun
For maidens who were wont to sit and gaze
Upon the grass, relinquished to their feet.
She causes boys to pile new plums and pears
On disregarded plate. The maidens taste
And stray impassioned in the littering leaves.
VI
Is there no change of death in paradise?
Does ripe fruit never fall? Or do the boughs
Hang always heavy in that perfect sky,
Unchanging, yet so like our perishing earth,
With rivers like our own that seek for seas
They never find, the same receding shores
That never touch with inarticulate pang?
Why set the pear upon those river banks
Or spice the shores with odors of the plum?
Alas, that they should wear our colors there,
The silken weavings of our afternoons,
And pick the strings of our insipid lutes!
Death is the mother of beauty, mystical,
Within whose burning bosom we devise
Our earthly mothers waiting, sleeplessly.
VII
Supple and turbulent, a ring of men
Shall chant in orgy on a summer morn
Their boisterous devotion to the sun,
Not as a god, but as a god might be,
Naked among them, like a savage source.
Their chant shall be a chant of paradise,
Out of their blood, returning to the sky;
And in their chant shall enter, voice by voice,
The windy lake wherein their lord delights,
The trees, like serafin, and echoing hills,
That choir among themselves long afterward.
They shall know well the heavenly fellowship
Of men that perish and of summer morn.
And whence they came and whither they shall go
The dew upon their feet shall manifest.
VIII
She hears, upon that water without sound,
A voice that cries, “The tomb in Palestine
Is not the porch of spirits lingering.
It is the grave of Jesus, where he lay.”
We live in an old chaos of the sun,
Or old dependency of day and night,
Or island solitude, unsponsored, free,
Of that wide water, inescapable.
Deer walk upon our mountains, and the quail
Whistle about us their spontaneous cries;
Sweet berries ripen in the wilderness;
And, in the isolation of the sky,
At evening, casual flocks of pigeons make
Ambiguous undulations as they sink,
Downward to darkness, on extended wings.
~~~~
Public Domain. First published in Harmonium (1923)

Wallace Stevens (1879 – 1955) was an American modernist poet. He was born in Reading, Pennsylvania, educated at Harvard and then New York Law School, and spent most of his life working as an executive for an insurance company in Hartford, Connecticut.
From the first, critics and fellow poets praised Stevens. Hart Crane wrote to a friend in 1919, after reading some of the poems that would make up Harmonium, “There is a man whose work makes most of the rest of us quail.” The Poetry Foundation states that “by the early 1950s Stevens was regarded as one of America’s greatest contemporary poets, an artist whose precise abstractions exerted substantial influence on other writers.” Some critics, like Randall Jarrell and Yvor Winters, praised Stevens’s early work but were critical of his more abstract and philosophical later poems.
Harold Bloom, Helen Vendler, and Frank Kermode are among the critics who have cemented Stevens’s position in the canon as one of the key figures of 20th-century American Modernist poetry. Bloom has called Stevens “a vital part of the American mythology” and unlike Winters and Jarrell, Bloom has cited Stevens’s later poems, like “Poems of our Climate,” as among his best.
More recently, Stevens’s reputation has been damaged by charges of racism. The phrase “nigger mystics” in his poem “Prelude to Objects”, and the title of his poem “Like Decorations in a Nigger Cemetery” are offensive to many contemporary readers. His racism is further illustrated by this anecdote from Joan Richardson’s 1988 biography of Stevens: “It happened during the meeting of the National Book Award committee that gave the poetry prize to Marianne Moore. [F]ive [judges, including] Wallace Stevens … passed the time looking at photographs of previous meetings of National Book Award judges. Gwendolyn Brooks appeared in one of these. On seeing the photo, Stevens remarked, ‘Who’s the coon?’ … Noticing the reaction of the group to his question, he asked, ‘I know you don’t like to hear people call a lady a coon, but who is it?’” (bio adapted from Wikipedia)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
I have to read him if I stumble across him anywhere. I felt so blessed to learn the cottage I met in for a workshop in Key West was the one where he often stayed. Genius is genius whether of the sea or no!
LikeLiked by 1 person
How wonderful to share a writing space with the spirit of Stevens!
>
LikeLike
if we lived in Heaven, we’d never encounter the knee-jerk racism of those bitter snipes attributed to Stevens. But likewise, we couldnt experience the trembling ambiguity, the precious confusion of one of my forever favorite poems.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Well-said, Louise. Thank you!
>
LikeLike
I love his poetry. I am glad he was of another generation so I can be amazed by the work and not infuriated by the person.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Hahaha. Well-said, Donna!
>
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Michael!
LikeLike
I have met quite a few ‘famous’ people in my life – in all categories. Not one was what I had imagined in my mind. Their flaws were many, lesser and worse, and often unbearable and VERY disappointing indeed. Still, I tend to separate their work from their humanity with all its imponderables, even though this is an illusion I need, I suppose. It is often their very failure at being a perfect human being that makes their work possible. Quite a conundrum. This poem is awesome.
LikeLiked by 5 people
I try to do the same. I am most successful at this with those who are dead.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Reading Stevens, there are two judgements which, at least in my mind, are contradictory:
1: He is one of the most important poets to write in the American language, having written a number of magnificent poems such as Sunday Morning, The Snowman, and Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird.
2: He was a blatant racist. Not only did he use racist language in his poems, but a number of his acquaintances reported his use of racial epithets.
As with the work of Jefferson, who owned slaves, Heidegger, who belonged to the German Nazi Party, and Pound, who was pro-fascist and antisemitic, I find myself keeping two sets of accounts which are irreconcilable.
LikeLiked by 9 people
I have had trouble with this balancing–how to love some of Stevens’ poems without feeling like that regard sanctions his blatant racism. “Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird” and “The House was Quiet and the World was Calm” are two of my favorites. With some writers, I have to be careful not to throw out the babies with the bathwater.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Genius and great art–a masterwork.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, Lord, Mike! I hadn’t read this one
LikeLiked by 1 person
One of Stevens’s best poems, I think. A strong argument for turning away from established theology to a more nature-based meditative approach. But of course it is the music of the language that carries the poem. The argument is merely the ladder the poem ascends.
>
LikeLiked by 6 people
Oh, you are so right Michael, in this comment and in the introductory comment! This is the first modernist poem I feel in love with, lapsed Catholic as I am, and it must have hugely influenced my subsequent reading in classes and outside, not to mention my inner and poetic life. Maybe the revelation also for me was that Thanks for sharing it! And then, yes, the poems I read not for classes, where the racist poems were silently excluded from syllabi, but on my own, and then the stories about things he said about Gwendolyn Brooks, for one, but I’m sure there are other incidents. Yes, definitely two accountings and yes, irreconcilable.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Thanks, Mary. One of the greatest disappointments of my life was going to a well-regarded graduate program and meeting the flawed human beings who had written great poems.
LikeLiked by 8 people
My education is not in writing, so I have been spared the MFA experience. but I have witnessed some awful things by artists of all sorts.
LikeLiked by 4 people