A curated webspace for Poetry, Politics, and Nature with over 20,000 daily subscribers and over 8,000 archived posts.
My mother and my uncle (my mother’s only sibling) were both high school English teachers. When they got together a couple times a year – she lived in Baltimore and he lived in Cincinnati – they talked about the books they taught. Sometimes they overlapped: both of them taught, for instance, A Tale of Two Cities and were fond of quoting the opening sentence to one another. My mom, however, was more adventurous than my uncle. I recall her teaching, among other books, The Return of the Native, My Ántonia, and Lord Jim. Eustacia Vye, “the raw material of a divinity” (according to Thomas Hardy), was very real to my mother. She talked about her as if she lived down the street. Literature was like that for her. It informed her life.
My mother’s classes were not advanced placement classes. I’m sure some students didn’t read those books and fumbled their way through the tests but most of her students did read those books. As my mother liked to put it, if you were serious with your students and gave them serious books to read, they could be serious in return. They certainly wanted to be taken seriously. And it must have plain to her students that my mother had the chief ingredient one looks for in a teacher – enthusiasm. My uncle was one of those English teachers who preferred grammar and debate to literature, but my mother had read the great Russians in translation in her undergraduate days and they stayed with her, that sense of the gravity and depth that literature could bring.
To some this seems self-evident but only to some. Increasingly, the sense of vision that literature provides seems beside the point, the point being technological progress, constant entertainment, information overload, powerful societal stresses including but not limited to drugs and abuse, increasingly authoritarian political answers, economic “growth,” and environmental instability. Then there are the sheer facts that go with a distracted life – a limited attention span, an unwillingness to take on challenges, and an utter lack of patience. If it isn’t immediate, why bother with it? If it’s subjective, a matter of a person’s sensibility, who cares? And who is anyone to authoritatively tell anyone else what is worthwhile? Might they not be prejudiced, purblind, behind the times? In a society obsessed for marketing purposes with novelty and the contemporaneous, anything from the past, even a not-that- long-ago past is suspect. Hardy’s England with its rural customs might as well have been in the 16th century.
My mother wanted to help her students understand life better and literature was a help in doing that. An admirer of Albert Camus, she wept when he died. I was eleven and asked her why she was crying. She put the newspaper down and told me that a great writer had died, a special writer. I can still see my mother’s eyes, somewhat unfocused from her tears. I can hear the tremor in her voice. She had lost someone who mattered to her. To me at that age, Camus was no more than a name, but I’ve come to empathize with how she felt. My mother was hemmed in on the usual fronts by female responsibilities. Camus offered a sense of life that was not hemmed in, even though circumstances could be dire. A crucial degree of personal latitude existed that could not be talked away. That latitude was part of what my mother was trying to communicate each day to her students. I say “trying” because my mother was up against the dilemma that was well articulated by Hannah Arendt: “The problem of education in the modern world lies in the fact that by its very nature it cannot forgo either authority or tradition, and yet must proceed in a world that is neither structured by authority nor held together by tradition.”
As far as literature was concerned, novels, in particular, spoke to my mother. It wasn’t just the creation of a world within several hundred pages, though, since she relished Dickens, that certainly mattered to her. Rather, it was the sense that the novelist delved into the confused tangle of life and showed through dialogue and dramatic actions how people were with one another and how the emotional range of those interactions was something like infinite. Like anyone who loves literature, especially novels, she had a hunger for that range of feelings. Novels endorsed life and though most people have gotten along more or less fine without such an endorsement, for some, like my mother (and myself) that species of insight is crucial because there is nothing like it. All the inveighing, for example, that goes with politics has nothing to do with what novels can do. That lack of inveighing is a blessed trait of fiction, even fiction that treats of political matters such as, to name another book my mother knew, All the King’s Men by Robert Penn Warren.
Sometimes, my mother got down about her teaching, sighing as she went through a stack of themes, lighting a Salem cigarette, and staring off into space. She rarely had a student who cared the way she cared, who was passionate about literature. She understood her class was just a class and a grade. Or she tried to tell herself that. More than once, she wondered aloud how the country-at-large could understand anything about itself if it didn’t pay attention to the literature that had grown up with the nation and that spoke to the nation’s certainties and uncertainties, the beliefs that also were the fault lines. She adored Adlai Stevenson because he seemed to be someone who esteemed books, not that he was going to raise that inclination in a debate with Dwight Eisenhower. Like many, she welcomed the advent of John F. Kennedy and mourned his shocking death. Then the war in Vietnam became front and center and then, in 1969 at the age of forty-eight my mother died of cancer.
It’s plain that the drift of American society, regardless of political inclination, is away from a belief that the vision of literature matters, that the society, as my title indicates, is losing literature. A mass society, after all, is exactly that – a composite in which each person identifies as a particular identity unit among similar units. Since commerce dominates daily life, each person registers foremost as a consumer. Life’s choices seem consumer choices as different identity brands compete for interest. Everything can start to feel like online shopping. Spending time with the random yet intense dramas of life as represented in literature seems more and more a waste of time to more and more people. What is the point of bothering with Thomas Hardy’s England or, even, Willa Cather’s Nebraska? Detestation of the past (or mere indifference) is very strong among people who are flattered day and night by technological wizardry. To feel the past, whether as a locale or a value, takes some imagination, the sort of imagination that literature stokes. To stand up for the vision that literature offers and insist on the value of that vision in and of itself and not as some ideological tool takes a commitment that even so-called higher education has, over recent decades, largely washed its advanced hands of. Yet however much some variety of virtue asserts itself, literature refuses to be about right thinking. Instead, literature challenges the very idea of right thinking, which is one reason tyrants have suppressed literature, though that suppression is ably carried out by any zealous group of chiding, censorious know-it-alls.
I see my mother underlining some paperback by Joseph Conrad or Edith Wharton. I hear that sigh when she paused in her reading and looked around as if to remember where she was and who she was. Mere fictions – she could not get enough of them. Not because they turned her away from life but because they turned her evermore toward life.
Baron Wormser has received the Frederick Bock Prize from Poetry and the Kathryn A. Morton Prize along with fellowships from Bread Loaf, the National Endowment for the Arts and the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation. Wormser founded the Frost Place Conference on Poetry and Teaching and also the Frost Place Seminar. For a list of his books, please click here.
Copyright 2024 Baron Wormser

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
This essay was selected by editors of Best American Essays as a Notable Essay of 2024.
LikeLike
Baron, as ever, you are sadly spot-on. I once taught at the high school level… but only for a year. Having discovered that I didn’t want to do so demanding a job for any longer than that, I opted for the relatively cushy college option. But even my brief exposure to secondary classrooms left me with the sure sense that teachers like your mother– and your tribute is exquisite– are heroes of the first order. Our younger son is a dedicated 8th-grade teacher, and I am proud as can be of him for that. (When he first started, and we asked him how it was going, he chuckled and said “Karma is a bitch.”) It saddens me that our world has become one in which if it can’t be quantified and/or commodified, to hell with it. You too are a hero, my friend, an inspiration; via your poems, your essays, and your person you continue, movingly, to fight the good fight. Thank you!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Baron, for writing this essay. Our mother is an exemplary figure and it is a wonderful tribute to her. Her soul was fed by classic literature, music, art, and imagination. Students could feel her enthusiasm for classic literature, and it often became infectious. That kind of enthusiasm appears to erased by the current world of technology and social media.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Baron responds: “Thank you, Sherry. She really was exemplary.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
How I wish Baron were wrong–that people today were beginning to value all that literature gives more and more, instead of the opposite–as that would be such an immensely hopeful sign that the intelligence and imagination and curiosity and empathy gained by reading great books will somehow save us in the end. Alas, Baron is as insightful as ever. I’m grateful for his essay and yet I’m also troubled and saddened by how right he is.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks, Meg. Me too.
>
LikeLiked by 1 person
A beautiful merger of his love for his mother with his tale of her love for reading and teaching the novel. Through her enthusiasm and skill, it must have been a lively instrument for teaching understanding with her students. Bravo to Baron Wormser, once again. We need more people like him and his mom.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, Bravo!
>
LikeLiked by 1 person
Although my high school students are being confused and bamboozled by technology (AI, ChatGPT, and the like), they each still have a human heart—and the fight to regain literature, beautifully encouraged in the essay, is on…tomorrow, in fact.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Amen, Baron x
LikeLiked by 1 person
Once again, how I love and am grateful for Baron Wormser’s brilliant mind. Thank you!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, I love his essays. He writes clearly and compassionately about very complex subjects.
M.
>
LikeLiked by 1 person
cicero was right to describ libraries and gardens as the essentials of life
LikeLiked by 2 people
Exactly!
>
LikeLiked by 1 person
Both libraries and gardens take some patience to glean their bounty. The short attention spans of younger users pose problems for both.
One solution school and public libraries are trying is the stocking of Graphic Novels. These seem to attract the attention of a new breed of readers. And some are pretty darned interesting.
LikeLike
I think that graphic novels are coming into their own as an art form. Very interesting to watch the genre gain sophistication.
>
LikeLike