Vox Populi

A curated webspace for Poetry, Politics, and Nature. Over 16,000 daily subscribers. Over 7,000 archived posts.

George Monbiot: The Roots of Fascism

When political leaders brazenly flout the law, we are heading towards a very dark place. 

It is not a sufficient condition for fascism to take root, but it is a necessary one. The willingness of political leaders not only to break the law, but to revel in breaking it, is a fatal step towards the replacement of democracy with authoritarian terror.

We see this at work in the United States today, where the Republican Party’s blatant disregard for the constitution has allowed Donald Trump to escape impeachment. If Trump is elected for a second term, he will test the potential for wielding unconstitutional power to the limit. But the phenomenon is not confined to the US. Several powerful governments now wear illegality almost as a badge of honour. 

Fascist and pre-fascist governments share (among others) two linked characteristics: they proudly flout the laws that are supposed to restrain them, while introducing new, often unconstitutional laws to contain political opponents or to oppress minorities. 

In Brazil, outrages against indigenous people, opposition politicians and journalists are encouraged and celebrated at the highest levels of government. Jair Bolsonaro won the presidential election with the help of a judicial coup, in which due process was abandoned to secure the imprisonment of the front-runner, Luiz Inacio Da Silva (Lula). He has been photographed embracing two of the suspects in the murder of the left-wing councillor Marielle Franco, and has sought to block corruption investigations into his son Flávio, who allegedly has close links with members of the paramilitary gang accused of killing her.

In response to democratic protests, Brazil’s economy minister has threatened to impose martial law. Bolsonaro has called for the police to execute suspected criminals: “These guys are going to die in the streets like cockroaches – and that’s how it should be.” His racist comments about indigenous people, and curtailment of the agencies supposed to protect them, could help explain a new spate of murders by loggers, miners and ranchers. Human rights groups are seeking to persuade the International Criminal Court to investigate Bolsonaro for incitement to genocide.  

The investigative journalist Glenn Greenwald, who has published explosive reports about corruption and crime in Bolsonaro’s government, and his husband, the left-wing congressman and Guardian columnist David Miranda, have received repeated death threats, containing details about their lives that only the state could know. Greenwald has now been spuriously charged with cybercrimes. 

In India, the Prime Minister Narendra Modi, after discovering that his alleged association with the 2002 Gujarat massacres no longer appeared to tarnish his name, is laying the foundations for a vicious ethno-nationalism. His new Citizenship Act deliberately denies rights to Muslims, and could render millions of people stateless. People protesting against this act are brutally attacked by the police. Police and armed gangs have raided two Delhi universities, randomly beating up students, to spread generalised terror. In Uttar Pradesh, political opponents are routinely imprisoned without charge and tortured. 

Modi has ripped up the constitution to annex Jammu and Kashmir. The police have fired on people protesting peacefully against this illegal action, blinding some of them with shotgun pellets. Political leaders have been arrested and communications shut down. Officials treat this illegality as a brutal joke. The chief minister of Haryana, Manohar Lal Khattar, a close Modi ally, boasts that “now we will bring girls from Kashmir”, as colonial booty.

The president of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte, has bragged of riding around the streets of Davao on his motorbike when he was mayor of the city, shooting people he suspected of being criminals. Since becoming president, he has, in effect, turned the police into a giant death squad, empowering them to murder people they suspect of involvement in drugs crime. Unsurprisingly, this general licence has led to the murders of political opponents, land and environmental defenders.

Even as he applauds the killing of drug suspects, Duterte jokes about taking illegal drugs to keep himself awake at international summits. Opponents are imprisoned, judges are sacked and replaced, journalists are prosecuted on trumped-up charges. The imposition of martial law on the island of Mindanao is used to crush dissent: objectors are treated as terrorists and murdered. 

Like these other killer clowns, Trump may now feel he can get away with anything. His legal team has in the past suggested he has total immunity, boasting that he could literally get away with murder. A culture of impunity is spreading around the world. “Try to stop me” is the implicit motto in nations ranging from Hungary to Israel, Saudi Arabia to Russia, Turkey to China, Poland to Venezuela. Flaunting your disregard for the law is an expression of power.

It’s happening in the UK too, though so far on a smaller scale. The Brexit vote, which eventually enabled Boris Johnson’s government to take office, was secured with the help of blatant illegality. The government intends to carry out a legislative cleansingof Romani and Travellers, knowing that this offends our own Equality Act, and is likely to lead to a case before the European Court of Human Rights. It’s almost as if it welcomes the confrontation.

These are experiments in absolutism. They don’t amount to fascism in their own right. But in conjunction with the elevation of preposterous and desperate men, the denigration of minorities and immigrants, political violence, mass surveillance and widespread mockery of liberalism and social justice, they suggest that some countries, separately and together, are beginning to head towards the darkest of all political places. The normalisation of impunity is possibly the most important step towards authoritarian rule. Never let it be normal. 

Copyright 2020 George Monbiot. First published in the Guardian 5th February 2020

Donald Trump welcomes Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro to the White House on March 19, 2019. Trump brags that the two have a “fantastic working relationship.” Photo: REUTERS/Carlos Barria

7 comments on “George Monbiot: The Roots of Fascism

  1. gutierrezb
    February 19, 2020

    Thanks for sharing. I do worry that we are misidentifying the problem though, and that it’s the resurgence of white supremacist colonialism, and not fascism. In the U.S. the Republicans are holding on to power partly through a re-implementation of the Southern Strategy, voter suppression (aimed at poor people of color), and gerrymandering. Trump’s veiled encouragement of his supports to enact violence (saying “maybe there is” something the 2nd amendmenters could do to stop Hillary) and Bolsonaro’s encouragement of settler violence against indigenous peoples are both clearly re-enactments of white settler colonialism. Yes, all these leaders are veering towards authoritarianism. Colonialism and fascism are two systems that historically fed off each other (in terms of ideas) but they are two separate systems. You can see the seeds of German fascism in Hitler’s Mein Kampf, but Trump’s Art of the Deal has nothing to do with that. I worry that by focusing so much on “fascism” and imagining some 1940’s-era militant takeover of government, we lose sight of the fact that the real attack is already happening: colonialism and billionaires are causing large-scale government de-regulation and massive degradation of the environment, along with repressing peoples’ voting rights and, possibly next, taking away health care and other social programs, all at the expense of our collective future.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. melpacker
    February 17, 2020

    I appreciate Monbiot’s distinction between fascism and pre-fascism. It is important that we understand that difference. Too many on the left (and I am most definitely on the left) use the term fascism too loosely without understanding that if we are able to hold public protests decrying our current politics without being beaten and jailed, we are not under fascism…yet. To put it simply, fascism is not fully present where we are able to publicly oppose fascism.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Vox Populi
      February 17, 2020

      I think that the US today is very similar to Germany in the early 1930s when the Nazi party was consolidating power through both legal and illegal means. Leftists were being harassed and arrested, the press was being silenced, the church and the military were being brought under control, weaker countries were being occupied, but the wholesale roundup of Jews hadn’t started yet. Things are going to get much worse here before they start getting better.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Beth Peyton
    February 17, 2020

    Maybe it’s time for some women. Or very gentle men.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Vox Populi
      February 17, 2020

      Indeed, Beth!

      Liked by 1 person

    • John Lawson
      February 17, 2020

      There are plenty of Fascist and pre-Fascist women; 54% of white women voters supported Trump in 2016. Not all are right-wing fanatics, but many are.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Enter your email address to follow Vox Populi and receive new posts by email.

Join 16,092 other subscribers

Blog Stats

  • 4,683,902 hits


%d bloggers like this: