Vox Populi

A curated webspace for Poetry, Politics, and Nature with over 20,000 daily subscribers and over 8,000 archived posts.

More Military Interventions? For what, Ashton Carter?

wjastore's avatarThe Contrary Perspective

Ashton Carter,  I have some questions for you Ashton Carter, I have some questions

W.J. Astore

The juxtaposition of two stories in my NY Times military “feed” got me to thinking this morning.  The first story involves Ashton Carter, President Obama’s nominee to replace Chuck Hagel as America’s new Secretary of Defense.  Carter, the article suggests, is a “centrist who may advocate a stronger use of American power.” The second article updates American casualties in Afghanistan, noting that the Department of Defense (DoD) has identified 2,340 American troops who have died in the Afghan War and related operations.  Died for what was left unspecified.  A resurgent Taliban?  Record-setting opium production in Afghanistan?  An Afghan governmental power-sharing agreement that is actually contrary to its official constitution?

In U.S. governmental circles today, you’re “serious” if you favor military aggression and interventionism overseas; you’re hopelessly idealistic if you favor non-intervention and strategic retrenchment.

This is apparently why Chuck Hagel was ash-canned

View original post 264 more words


Discover more from Vox Populi

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a comment

Information

This entry was posted on December 6, 2014 by in Opinion Leaders and tagged , , , , , , , , , .

Blog Stats

  • 5,648,626

Archives

Discover more from Vox Populi

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading