Vox Populi

A Public Sphere for Poetry, Politics, and Nature

Valerie Vande Panne: 7 Economic Terms That Are Often Used to Destroy Communities

If it sounds too good to be true, take a closer look beyond the buzzwords.

There are so many plans these days to “transform” an area via a “public-private partnership” that will “restore” and “fix” the local economy and lead to an economic “recovery” for the “brave” group of “stakeholders” who’ve come together to make it happen. The business leader drumming up support is often a “good friend” of the politicians in charge. To entertain another plan, the people in power warn, will “hurt” the economy.

It’s a story told repeatedly, with different players: It’s the tale of Little Caesar’s Arena in Detroit. It’s the story of the big box stores including Wal-Mart and Home Depot. And it’s the story of Amazon’s HQ2.

No matter the project, the end result is the corporation pays little to no tax, and gives little to nothing to the community—not even the promised jobs. It is guaranteed to extract everything from captured tax dollars to fire and police resources, also paid for with tax dollars. It will likely capture education dollars and even take away employment from locals as small businesses close, and then it leaves the taxpayer with the clean-up bill. Empty, toxic real estate and a growing lower class are left behind.

In other words, these “transformational” projects drive locals into worse-off conditions while lining the pockets of the already wealthy.

It’s a tale as old as capitalism itself, and it’s being told over and over again with different players but using the same popular words.

Here are the economic development words to watch out for, and what they really mean.

1. Public-Private Partnership

Meaning: A massive tax dollar giveaway to a private company at taxpayer expense.

Taxpayers lose money on everything from schools to fire departments. Taxpayers end up footing the bill for the private company’s land, clean-up, and more. Taxpayers receive comparatively nothing in return.

Instead, communities are healthier and more sustainable when they are more economically vibrant and diverse with co-ops, small businesses, and collectives.

2. Restore

Meaning: We’ve destroyed something irreplaceable—a neighborhood, wetlands, a forest—and see a way to make even more money on what’s been destroyed.

This happens over and over again—it’s one of the cycles of capitalism. The truth is once the neighborhood is gone and its inhabitants displaced—once the habitat that took 1,000 years to create is destroyed—it cannot be restored. You cannot restore Detroit’s vibrant African American neighborhood of Black Bottom by putting in a B.B. King supper club any more than you can restore wetlands that took thousands of years to establish and flourish. What you’re doing is making money on destruction—not restoration.

Preservation is more powerful than the destroy-restore cycle.

3. Good Friend

Meaning: A favorite phrase thrown around in the Democratic Party and political circles nationwide; when someone says they are a “good friend,” what they really mean is they are stabbing that person or group in the back.

Be wary whenever someone tells you—especially in politics or development—that someone else important is a “good friend.”

Be honest about who people are, and listen for honesty when someone is trying to sell your community a development.

4. Stakeholders

Meaning: The modern-day equivalent of a dog-and-pony show, “stakeholders” is regularly used as a catch-all phrase by those who want to appear inclusive and cover their own asses.

The chosen “stakeholders” are often those with strong social media followings and the local LGBTQIA/POC community members likely to be the most friendly to the development plan. They are often offered a seat at the table because they are often those who are least likely to rock the boat. Pictures will be taken, Instagram posts made, tweets sent—inclusion looks like it feels so good.

Such stakeholder meetings are often exclusionary of those most marginalized, disenfranchised, and impacted by development plans.

5. Brave

Meaning: This one can be used for a “stakeholder” folding for the developer, or for a developer going into a depressed community.

It’s also used for a long list of virtue signaling. Brave used to be a word reserved for firemen running into burning buildings to save children and pets; self-sacrificing soldiers saving their brothers-in-arms and helpless civilians; non-violent protesters standing strong in the face of weapons, violence, and hate.

Bravery is not a self-righteous action—and definitely not meant for those selling out their community to a developer, or for a developer taking tax dollars to develop a community.

6. Fix

Meaning: Something is broken beyond repair—for example, the vast majority of public school systems. But there is a new way to make money on the broken-beyond-repair things by “fixing” them: For-profit charter schools and intensive testing, done by private corporations with state or local school system contracts paid for with tax dollars—all of which tend to break the system even more.

Developing new and locally tailored solutions to a broken system is possible—but it can mean leaving behind the broken system entirely.

7. Hurt

“We can’t do that; it’ll hurt the economy,” warns almost every politician when faced with an economically sound solution to ecological crises our society and planet are facing.

Meaning: What they mean is, it’ll hurt their own investments, their own power, and their own bottom line.

The fact is, few things hurt the economy and our environment more than the public-private partnerships, their schemes and scams, and development deals that let events like the Flint Water Crisis continue.

When someone says, “We can’t do that; it’ll hurt the economy,” ask yourself whose pocketbook it will really hurt, and chances are it’s not yours—it’s the people in power.

As George Carlin used to say, “America’s leading industry is still the manufacture, distribution, packaging and marketing of bullshit. High-quality bullshit; world-class, designer bullshit, to be sure.”

Valerie Vande Panne is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Local Peace Economy, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

This article was produced by Local Peace Economy, a project of the Independent Media Institute and is included in Vox Populi under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.

2 comments on “Valerie Vande Panne: 7 Economic Terms That Are Often Used to Destroy Communities

  1. universalpantry
    November 20, 2018

    Sharing with everyone and everywhere possible. Thank you.

    If we could step out of the box, turn around and look back inside, we could clearly see what Ms. Vande Pann is telling us. If we had gumption – or even a high school level of understanding of logical fallacies, propaganda and influence, we could take out the good to use as a foundation for a more equitable way of being and leave the boxed corruption.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Vox Populi
      November 20, 2018

      Thank you for this insight! I couldn’t agree more. — Michael Simms


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Enter your email address to follow Vox Populi and receive new posts by email.

Join 12,087 other followers

Blog Stats

  • 4,295,821 hits


%d bloggers like this: