Vox Populi

A Public Sphere for Poetry, Politics, and Nature

Paul Buchheit: The Super-Rich and Sordid Tales of Selfishness

Philanthropy, no matter how well intentioned, cannot compensate for the flaws of capitalism.

If the mainstream media made the effort to analyze and report the facts, the whole country would know about a level of selfishness that has spiraled out of control since the economists of the Reagan era convinced the wealthiest Americans that greed is good for everyone. Here are four extreme examples of that selfishness.

1. Ebola’s Not Worth the Money If Only Africans Get Infected

World Health Organization (WHO) director-general Dr. Margaret Chan recently stated: “Ebola emerged nearly four decades ago. Why are clinicians still empty-handed, with no vaccines and no cure? Because Ebola has historically been confined to poor African nations. The R&D incentive is virtually non-existent. A profit-driven industry does not invest in products for markets that cannot pay.”

So we turn to philanthropy. But rich donors don’t compensate for the flaws of capitalism. The Gates Foundation, among others, may appear noble and praiseworthy for all its charitable giving, but Dr. Chan noted that “My budget [is] highly earmarked, so it is driven by what I call donor interests.” Little of that ‘earmarking’ is toward diseases of the poor. A study in The Lancet of medical products registered in 2000-11 revealed that “Only four new chemical entities were approved for neglected diseases (three for malaria, one for diarrhoeal disease), accounting for 1% of the 336 new chemical entities approved during the study period.”

A related problem with philanthropy is summarized by Stacy Palmer, editor of The Chronicle of Philanthropy: “Wealthy people tend to give to colleges, art museums, opera and hospitals very generously…Food banks depend more on lower income Americans.”

The Chronicle of Philanthropy confirmed that Americans with annual earnings under $100,000 increased their post-recession giving by 4.5 percent. Americans who earned over $200,000 reduced their giving by 4.6 percent over the same time period.

2. Going To Their Graves Without Paying What They Owe

Charles Koch, who is very much alive, said “I want my fair share – and that’s all of it.”

His dream is coming true. $30 trillion has been taken since the recession, most of it financial gains, almost all of it by the richest 1%, one-hundred thousand of whom made an estimated $18 million each in three years, and most of whom are so rich that they can let their portfolios sit nearly tax-free until they die, at which point an almost non-existent estate tax ensures nearly tax-free fortunes for their fortunate sons and daughters (only about one out of a thousand estates are taxed).

Yet these are the people who benefit most from national security, infrastructure, tax laws, and patent and copyright laws. They’re protected by police who stop and frisk and harass and arrest anyone who threatens the status quo of their wealthy society. But they don’t want to pay for all the benefits, even after they’re dead.

3. Inventing Rules That Take Money from the Poor

A collection of contrived laws and policies effectively transfer money from the middle class to the rulemakers:

Capital Gains: Pay less for just owning stocks
Carried Interest: The astonishing claim that hedge fund profits are not regular income
Payroll Tax: Multi-millionaires pay a tiny percentage compared to middle-income earners
Roth IRAs: A tax loophole for the 20% of Americans who own 95 percent of the financial wealth
Derivatives: Risky financial instruments are the first to be paid off in a bank collapse
Bankruptcies: Businesses can get out of debt, students can’t.

4. Treating Less Fortunate People As If They Don’t Exist

Compelling research by Paul Piff and his colleagues has demonstrated that the accumulation of wealth leads to a sense of entitlement and qualities of narcissism. For example, rich people are more likely to flout traffic laws, to take items of value from others, and to cheat when necessary to win a prize or position.

At a higher level, irrefutable data has been accumulated to confirm the relentless flow of money away from our most vulnerable citizens:

Children: One out of every five American children lives in poverty, and for black children under the age of six it’s nearly one out of TWO. Almost half of food stamp recipients are children. Worldwide, 76 million children are living in poverty in the developed world, and hundreds of millions more in the developing world.

The Elderly: Three-quarters of Americans approaching retirement in 2010 had an average of less than $30,000 to support them in their retirement years.

The Homeless: According to The Nation, there are now more homeless people in New York City than at any time since the 1970s, and the number of homeless schoolchildren is at an all-time high.

The Sick and Disabled: Over 200 recent studies have confirmed a link between financial stress and sickness. In just 20 years America’s ranking among developed countries dropped on nearly every major health measure.

Privileged people: oblivious to the realities beneath their lofty positions, talk about struggling Americans getting “comfortable” in poverty, using food stamps to buy expensive food, and resting in the “hammock” of the safety net. Perhaps delusion helps them to rationalize their selfishness.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.

Paul Buchheit is a college teacher, an active member of US Uncut Chicago, founder and developer of social justice and educational websites (UsAgainstGreed.org, PayUpNow.org, RappingHistory.org), and the editor and main author of “American Wars: Illusions and Realities” (Clarity Press). He can be reached at paul@UsAgainstGreed.org.

3 comments on “Paul Buchheit: The Super-Rich and Sordid Tales of Selfishness

  1. L
    November 25, 2014

    Reblogged this on Zero Waste Millennial.

    Like

  2. Jeff Nguyen
    November 21, 2014

    Paulo Freire stated, “The generosity of the oppressors is nourished by an unjust order, which must be maintained in order to justify that generosity.” Philanthropy has historically been a euphemism for social engineering as practiced by the robber barons, past and present, so celebrated by the American textbooks.

    Like

  3. Words For The Internet
    November 21, 2014

    Reblogged this on Words For the Internet and commented:
    This article is excellent. Puts my thoughts in to words better than I ever could. “Eat the rich,” just doesn’t carry the same effect as a well thought out argument.

    Normally I don’t reblog, because I honestly don’t understand reblogging etiquette. But as someone who has first hand experience in the last few months dealing with a man who ruined the lives of several good employees because he made slightly less than the year before, I’m going to break my rule.

    Subscribe to Vox Populi. Everything they put out is well said. Even if you don’t agree with a piece it’s still presented in a solid way. I wish I had found the blog sooner honestly.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Information

This entry was posted on November 21, 2014 by in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , .

Enter your email address to follow Vox Populi and receive new posts by email.

Join 10,969 other followers

Blog Stats

  • 3,834,085 hits

Archives

%d bloggers like this: